<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How accurate and reliable are statistics from keyword research tools?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://websitebusinesskit.net/blog/how-accurate-and-reliable-are-statistics-from-keyword-research-tools.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://websitebusinesskit.net/blog/how-accurate-and-reliable-are-statistics-from-keyword-research-tools.html</link>
	<description>How To Create Your First Profitable Website Questions and Answers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Welch</title>
		<link>http://websitebusinesskit.net/blog/how-accurate-and-reliable-are-statistics-from-keyword-research-tools.html/comment-page-1#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websitebusinesskit.net/blog/how-accurate-and-reliable-are-statistics-from-keyword-research-tools.html#comment-226</guid>
		<description>I am not aware of any keyword research tools that are &quot;very accurate,&quot; and at best they tend to be &quot;somewhat helpful.&quot; 

There are several issues here. First, no tool is more reliable than the data it is &quot;fed,&quot; and neither Google nor Yahoo provide their search data to third parties. WordTracker uses data from a pool of smaller search engine sites, and often shows high traffic levels for very bizarre search phrases.   (In my experience, WordTracker&#039;s data includes &quot;fake traffic&quot; including traffic from other keyword-research bots.)

In addition, even your own data is not complete: you may find that your bidding draws 150 impressions per day for searches for &quot;where dubai&quot; but in fact, your ad might not be shown for 1,000 other searches done each day.  (Your data may also be &quot;over-inclusive,&quot; as you may be including searches through the Search Network, which aren&#039;t done at Google, or traffic on the Content Network).

Second, search patterns change over time; the number of searches for &quot;Santa Claus&#039; address&quot; rises in December and probably zeroes out from January to October. In addition to predictable seasons like that, there are random fluctuations as well as &quot;surges&quot; (when Jay Leno mentions widgets, there may be a bunch of web searches in the next 24 hours).

There are also &quot;cycles&quot; for certain search terms.  For example, searches for &quot;porn&quot; peak on weekends (Friday and Saturday night), while searches for &quot;football scores&quot; peak on Sunday and Monday.  For some search terms, it&#039;s possible that 80% to 90% of the total searches occur on a single day each week (&quot;lotto numbers&quot;), or even a single day each month or each quarter (&quot;Fed interest rate change&quot;).

Another crucial factor to consider is the activity of &quot;fraud operators,&quot; who use keyword research tools to identify high-bid keywords; when bid amounts rise, those terms attract more fraudulent activity (because fraudsters can make more money from each click than for low-bid terms), increasing volume.  

The bottom line is that you should absolutely NEVER rely on any tools to be reliable -- not even within an &quot;order of magnitude&quot; -- in predicting search volumes for specific keywords or even &quot;keyword families.&quot;

Mark Welch
Internet Marketing Consultant
http://www.MarkWelch.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not aware of any keyword research tools that are &quot;very accurate,&quot; and at best they tend to be &quot;somewhat helpful.&quot; </p>
<p>There are several issues here. First, no tool is more reliable than the data it is &quot;fed,&quot; and neither Google nor Yahoo provide their search data to third parties. WordTracker uses data from a pool of smaller search engine sites, and often shows high traffic levels for very bizarre search phrases.   (In my experience, WordTracker&#8217;s data includes &quot;fake traffic&quot; including traffic from other keyword-research bots.)</p>
<p>In addition, even your own data is not complete: you may find that your bidding draws 150 impressions per day for searches for &quot;where dubai&quot; but in fact, your ad might not be shown for 1,000 other searches done each day.  (Your data may also be &quot;over-inclusive,&quot; as you may be including searches through the Search Network, which aren&#8217;t done at Google, or traffic on the Content Network).</p>
<p>Second, search patterns change over time; the number of searches for &quot;Santa Claus&#8217; address&quot; rises in December and probably zeroes out from January to October. In addition to predictable seasons like that, there are random fluctuations as well as &quot;surges&quot; (when Jay Leno mentions widgets, there may be a bunch of web searches in the next 24 hours).</p>
<p>There are also &quot;cycles&quot; for certain search terms.  For example, searches for &quot;porn&quot; peak on weekends (Friday and Saturday night), while searches for &quot;football scores&quot; peak on Sunday and Monday.  For some search terms, it&#8217;s possible that 80% to 90% of the total searches occur on a single day each week (&quot;lotto numbers&quot;), or even a single day each month or each quarter (&quot;Fed interest rate change&quot;).</p>
<p>Another crucial factor to consider is the activity of &quot;fraud operators,&quot; who use keyword research tools to identify high-bid keywords; when bid amounts rise, those terms attract more fraudulent activity (because fraudsters can make more money from each click than for low-bid terms), increasing volume.  </p>
<p>The bottom line is that you should absolutely NEVER rely on any tools to be reliable &#8212; not even within an &quot;order of magnitude&quot; &#8212; in predicting search volumes for specific keywords or even &quot;keyword families.&quot;</p>
<p>Mark Welch<br />
Internet Marketing Consultant<br />
<a href="http://www.MarkWelch.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.MarkWelch.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

